Apple's AMP1 paper: general LLMs write code to control robot arms at 96.3% success

APPSO · wechat · 2026-11-11

Apple's November 6 paper AMP1 (Agentic Manipulation Policies) takes a path opposite to mainstream VLA/WAM approaches: a general-purpose LLM watches camera feeds, writes Python to compute trajectories, executes and verifies—no task-specific training data.

Key results: on RoboLab-120 simulation, Gemini 4 Argon + AMP1 hit 85.6% and Claude Opus 5.5 82.8%, vs. 49.2% for the best VLA and 42.9% for the best WAM. On a real Franka arm, error recovery pushed success to 96.3% (vs. 87.0% without), while baselines FLUX3 Action and π0.5 managed 45.4% and 27.8%. With persistent memory, RoboDojo zero-shot success jumped from 26.4% to 84.1%. Model quality matters hugely: removing depth info barely hurt Opus 5.5 but crashed Haiku 5.5 from 51.6% to 10.7%.

Notable emergent behaviors include using a spoon as a tool to reposition an unreachable bottle and self-diagnosing camera calibration errors. The main weakness is speed: 280 seconds per task, 211s spent on inference, limiting use to quasi-static scenes. The article also links this to Apple's HALO humanoid paper on a Unitree G1 driven by Qwen models on a Mac mini, arguing Apple is shifting robotics competition from hardware to software capability.

Related event: Apple Paper Shows General LLMs Beat Specialized VLA at Zero-Shot Robot Manipulation(4 posts)→

Original post →

More from Embodied

Embodied channel →