Cybercab scaling debate: geofence holes and railroad refusals suggest unsupervised FSD isn't ready—wait for AI5 chip
Darpinian · x · 2026-11-11
In an exchange on Cybercab readiness, Darpinian argues unsupervised FSD isn't ready to go wide: accident rates can't yet be reliably determined from mileage, and documented geofence holes plus weird routes (like refusing to cross railroads) suggest incompleteness. He'd wait for the AI5 chip before scaling Cybercab production, expecting meaningful safety gains. vedantnair counters that metro-area taxi service is pretty much there already.
Related event: Observer Says Tesla Should Wait for AI5 Chip Before Mass-Producing Cybercab(3 posts)→
More from Embodied
- Sharpa Humanoid Robot Takes Polaroid Photos at Shanghai CIIE — Scobleizer · 2026-11-11
- LeRobot 0.7 streams terabyte robotics datasets from the Hub, cutting data wait to 0.52% of step time — LysandreJik · 2026-11-11
- Fable 5.2 designs a Tamagotchi across KiCad, Inventor and Blender — ZeYanjie · 2026-11-11
- Compact exoskeleton glove with encoders and tactile sensing shown at CoRL 2026 — ZeYanjie · 2026-11-11
- Wheeled bases, not legs: why production-test humanoids should skip bipedal design — AIFlow_ML · 2026-11-11
- Walden Robotics demos a robot tending a laser cutter fully autonomously — adnothing · 2026-11-11