One prompt, three Claude versions: side-by-side video reveals real capability gaps
FinanceYF5 · x · 2026-11-11
Demo #3 in FinanceYF5's Fable 5.2 series: the same 'human body in motion' prompt was given to three different Claude versions. Side by side, the differences in how each model understands motion, skeletons and body structure are striking — sometimes one video shows model progress better than a page of benchmarks.
More from Models
- User hits Qwen4-Max usage cap after ~1 hour, suspects lowered limits vs Qwen3-Max — cedric_chee · 2026-11-11
- Unverified speculation: Opus 5.5 allegedly a 'diluted' Fable 5.5; stronger model too unusable to ship — haider1 · 2026-11-11
- Fable 5.2 builds a 3D game in 76 min for ~$42 in tokens, roughly matching Opus 5.5 — FinanceYF5 · 2026-11-11
- Qwen-4-max-preview Scores Below Qwen-3.8-flash in Early User Benchmarks — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-11
- Security researcher: Abliterated models drastically improve offensive-security reasoning — matthew_d_green · 2026-11-11
- Independent test: abliterated GLM Flash finishes pentest benchmarks 2-3x faster — matthew_d_green · 2026-11-11