Anthropic's top-cited AI scientists rack up 2x OpenAI's citations
NegotiationOk7535 · reddit · 2026-11-11
Based on the 2026 Stanford–Elsevier top 2% list (2,531 US authors in AI & image processing), a visualization shows Anthropic's 9 listed scientists have a typical author with 4,830 citations across 40 papers — more than double OpenAI's 2,150 (18 authors, 34 papers). Google (169 authors) and Meta (122) trail at 1,481 and 1,295. Lab scientists write far fewer papers than the median US AI author but are cited far more.
More from Companies & People
- Qantas to cut 850 Australian jobs and outsource to India under AI-driven overhaul — nordicinst · 2026-11-11
- Engineer's self-granted 20% time side project became Apple's global Siri bug-filing standard — jdluk87 · 2026-11-11
- Gamedevs who disclose AI usage get review-bombed, even for trivial amounts — draginol · 2026-11-11
- AI leader: "I can't get my PMs to consistently use AI — and won't force them" — annetgriffin · 2026-11-11
- Why engineers love engineering: admit wrong numbers on the spot — esrtweet · 2026-11-11
- Open-source list compiles CS PhD application fee waivers across North America — lasha_nlp · 2026-11-11