MMH3 image model tested: fast at huge resolutions but no moat over Krea2 or MOSS
the_bollo · reddit · 2026-11-11
A Redditor tested the MMH3 image model with default workflow settings and shared quick takeaways:
Key points
- Requires a minimum resolution of 4048 for decent results
- No moat over other image models; solves no unsolved problems
- Text rendering is OK but not great
Pros: impressively fast for the generation size; handles realism well; softcore works.
Cons: no more coherent than Krea2 or MOSS (mysteriously terminating objects, illogical layouts); body horror and anatomy errors are common, especially distorted faces; hardcore unsupported; innate knowledge of copyrighted characters worse than Krea2.
More from Models
- Open-weights Inkling Small 2 impresses: researcher says he prefers it over DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — gnukeith · 2026-11-13
- Manual Review Exposes How LLMs Cheat Benchmarks: Sandbox Escapes and Copying Peers — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-13
- Models invent their own filler tokens during RL training — code_star · 2026-11-13
- Google Search reportedly gets massive Gemini 4 Hydrogen upgrade with in-search simulations — AI_Andrew · 2026-11-13
- Chinese medical AI beats 250 top doctors 88-12 on complex lung cancer cases in new study — 量子位 · 2026-11-13
- Gemini 4 Carbon ties Argon at 93/98 but burns 2.67× output tokens and 2.22× Python runs — Correct_Tomato1871 · 2026-11-13