Indie game dev admits AI-assisted coding but keeps all creative work human-made
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-11-11
Asked to promise a game isn't "AI slop," indie dev APOTOP shared a candid reply: they do use AI-assisted coding tools sometimes, but as a CS Master's student won't ship a vibe-coded mess — AI coding is legitimate as long as the developer understands what they're doing. All creative work (models, art, music, writing, voice acting, magic design) stays 100% human-made. Commenter notes this is what intentional AI use in game dev actually looks like, a qualitative gulf above TL slop — and suspects the dev understates their dependency.
More from coding & agent
- OCC puts autonomous AI payment agents in its highest risk tier for banks — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-11-11
- HydraDB builds a unified knowledge graph to give AI agents accurate context — vaibhavbetter · 2026-11-11
- Reddit Users Compare Notes on GLM-5.3-flash's Random Coding Mistakes — JustinHoMi · 2026-11-11
- Dev fine-tunes Qwen3-1.7B into a 1.83GB GLB 3D asset coder that runs on CPU — ConfidentDinner6648 · 2026-11-11
- Solo dev shares 20k-word workflow: Opus 5.5 + Seedance 2.5 for 4 viral product videos — dotey · 2026-11-11
- CodeGraph turns codebases into Neo4j graphs so agents can do dependency-aware refactoring — JeremyCMorgan · 2026-11-11