Same prompt head-to-head: Fable 5.2 spends 4x more than Opus 5.5 for better lighting
aitrendz_xyz · x · 2026-11-10
Running the same glass-pool prompt, Claude Fable 5.2 took 1h30m and $57.87 versus Opus 5.5's 68 minutes and $14.39. Fable was slower and 4x pricier, but its sunset and night lighting are on another level.
More from Models
- Ben Todd: benchmark extrapolation may push AI task-automation timeline out 6-8 months — ben_j_todd · 2026-11-10
- Fable 5.2 tops Remote Labor Index at 41.3%, nearly doubling next-best Opus 5.5 — haider1 · 2026-11-10
- Re-running an old castle prompt: Fable 5.2's procedural Blender output is a visible jump — aitrendz_xyz · 2026-11-10
- Fable 5.2 plus a few Opus subagents produces a complex 3D scene in ~30 minutes — aitrendz_xyz · 2026-11-10
- mark_k pours cold water on Fable 5.2 AGI hype: "Let's not get carried away" — mark_k · 2026-11-10
- Fable 5.2 Reviews Itself From 160 User Reports: 5 Rules for Using It Cheaply — henrik392 · 2026-11-10