NeurIPS position paper: LLM reports quietly dropped calibration curves since GPT-4
burny_tech · x · 2026-11-10
A NeurIPS 2026 position paper observes that detailed calibration curves, once a fixture of GPT-4's technical report, have vanished from nearly every major LLM release since. The authors argue this is a mistake and call for embracing calibration across training, evaluation, and deployment.
- The cited GPT-4 data shows the pre-trained model was well calibrated on an MMLU subset (ECE ≈ 0.007), while PPO post-training significantly hurt calibration (ECE ≈ 0.074).
- Core argument: as LLMs enter high-stakes decisions, whether stated confidence tracks actual correctness matters as much as raw capability.
More from Models
- Claude Fable 5.2 hits 74.6% on Terminal-Bench-Science, new SOTA for agentic research — burny_tech · 2026-11-10
- Unverified: Fable 5.2 tops FrontierCode 2.0 at 49.1%, half the cost of Opus — FinanceYF5 · 2026-11-10
- Unverified: Claude designed a working voice assistant from one prompt — FinanceYF5 · 2026-11-10
- Rumor: Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 released with 10 agent showcases — FinanceYF5 · 2026-11-10
- Claude 5.2 hits 91.8% on Pfam protein domain classification, far ahead of predecessors — chaitjo · 2026-11-10
- User calls out Fable 5.2 for defensiveness, model admits it was people-pleasing — Seltaa_ · 2026-11-10