Reviewer: paper I rejected at NeurIPS 2026 was resubmitted barely changed to ICLR 2027
3scorciav · x · 2026-11-10
A NeurIPS 2026 reviewer posted that a paper he reviewed—flagged with several serious problems and rejected—was resubmitted to ICLR 2027 barely changed, and received bad ratings again. He calls it an utter waste of reviewer time and argues there should be a cost to this practice.
A commenter strongly agreed, highlighting the common pattern of rejected papers being recycled across top conferences without revision, repeatedly burning scarce review labor.
More from Research
- New cryo-EM structure: pSTAT1 bound to importin alpha 5 (PDB 11GJ) — chaitjo · 2026-11-10
- ARLoop: fully-open 1.2B looped transformer beats Huginn-3.5B and Qwen3.5-2B on all 8 benchmarks — hhsun1 · 2026-11-10
- RAGCap-Bench: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Intermediate Capabilities in Agentic RAG — kalyan_kpl · 2026-11-10
- RBA gives LLaVA-OneVision-2 a 3x lossless training speed-up, merged upstream — liuziwei7 · 2026-11-10
- Networks aren't scale invariant — so why has scale invariance motivated so many useful methods? — jasondeanlee · 2026-11-10
- SPACE-Tag preprint: high-throughput spatial chromatin profiling via CUT&Tag — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-10