210-page analysis argues a durable pause on frontier AI training is feasible
wfithian · x · 2026-11-10
AI Safety researcher David Krueger published a LessWrong post introducing his team's newly released 210-page paper analyzing whether a durable pause on frontier AI training is feasible, noting many in the field still haven't heard of the work. He thinks it will be "the best plan by most people's lights," though he personally leans toward also getting rid of chips and fabs.
Related event: 26 Researchers Argue a Decade-Long Hard Pause on Frontier AI Is Feasible(3 posts)→
More from Safety
- NeurIPS workshop paper: gradient-based data attribution can't reliably filter subliminal learning — ponguru · 2026-11-10
- Miles Brundage shares a video on the challenge of supervising automated AI R&D — Miles_Brundage · 2026-11-10
- Memphis data centers led by xAI generated $54M in tax revenue amid pause proposal — pickover · 2026-11-10
- BlueDot Impact CEO: AI Safety's Biggest Gap Is a Lack of Entrepreneurs — luke_drago_ · 2026-11-10
- Community pushes AI labs to publish system cards as machine-readable jsonl data — scaling01 · 2026-11-10
- BlueDot CEO: AI Safety Talent All Wants OpenAI, Government Pipelines Lag — luke_drago_ · 2026-11-10