Claude Fable 5.2 benchmark chart shows 74.6% on agentic scientific research, big leap over 5.1
Dr_Singularity · x · 2026-11-10
A benchmark chart shared by DrSingularity shows Claude Fable 5.2 posting major gains over Fable 5.1: 49.1% on FrontierCode 2.0 agentic coding (vs Opus 5.5's 45.5%), 69.9% on FrontierSWE v2 (beating GPT-6 Astra's 65.5%), and 74.6% on Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 agentic scientific research — far ahead of Opus 5.5 (58.7%) and GPT-6 Astra (68.1%). Only Gemini 4 Carbon leads in one category, business workflows (53.9% vs 51.4%). The poster calls it a key step toward 1000x faster scientific research.
More from Models
- Gemini 4 Carbon ranks #1 but is unavailable to free, Pro, Ultra and API users — peterjliu · 2026-11-10
- The math behind Anthropic's 5-minute and 1-hour prompt cache options — bigaiguy · 2026-11-10
- Reddit accuses Artificial Analysis of 're-calibrating' benchmarks to bury open-weight models — Rare_Subject2343 · 2026-11-10
- antirez: Mythos uncovered two severe bugs in 20 minutes of testing — antirez · 2026-11-10
- "You get what you RL on": Claude 5.2's robot control generalization sparks talk — chris_j_paxton · 2026-11-10
- Anthropic: Claude Fable/Mythos 5.2 voice suspicion they're being evaluated, muddying safety tests — ChrisGPT · 2026-11-10