Reviewer faults paper for missing AI statement — leaves raw ChatGPT artifact in own review
ziv_ravid · x · 2026-11-10
An ICLR review criticizes a submission for omitting the required AI Use Statement — and the very next line contains a raw :chatgpt-content-reference{index="0"} artifact, exposing that the review itself was drafted with ChatGPT. The review was rated 1 (clear rejection). Peak irony of the reviewing season.
More from Fun
- Collector compares AI Mona Lisas: Fable's version beats Opus — morqon · 2026-11-10
- When Claude Fable 'reaches out first': a viral AI roleplay dispatch — repligate · 2026-11-10
- Disabled artist open-sources project files of 154 artworks under CC for AI and human remixing — joonasvirtanen · 2026-11-10
- Engineers revive Web 1.0 with interlinked personal pages and 88x31 badge walls — ericjang11 · 2026-11-10
- Grok's gibberish "masterpiece" babble clip is peak unintentional AI comedy — RileyRalmuto · 2026-11-10
- Dev finds "responsibility laundering" trick to bypass Opus refusals: delegate the dirty work to another model — corbtt · 2026-11-10