Muse Ember declines 64% of knowledge questions, halving its hallucination rate
ArtificialAnlys · x · 2026-11-10
Artificial Analysis published the full per-benchmark charts for Muse Ember (max) across the nine Intelligence Index evaluations, including AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience, HLE-Diamond and GDP.pdf.
Key takeaway: knowledge is Muse Ember's main weakness — its 21.1% AA-Omniscience accuracy is the lowest among comparable models, largely because it declines to answer 64% of questions. That keeps its hallucination rate at 17.4%, half of Claude Haiku 5.5's.
More from Models
- Claude Fable Leaves Plan Limits on Nov 16, Switches to Usage Credits Only — heypearlai · 2026-11-10
- Grok nears 100 million monthly active users — NicoVerderosa · 2026-11-10
- Upgrading a free account still nets you Fable resets, user reports — Sauers_ · 2026-11-10
- Upgrading a free account keeps your Fable weekly resets, user discovers — Sauers_ · 2026-11-10
- Matt Shumer burned 400B+ tokens testing Fable 5.2 — here's what he built — mattshumer_ · 2026-11-10
- Head-to-head: Claude Fable 5.2 beats Opus 5.5 in 4 of 5 real-world tests — petergyang · 2026-11-10