Ramez clarifies: exponential-input headwinds point, not 'AI is dead'
ramez · x · 2026-11-10
Ramez clarifies his widely-shared tweet was never meant to say 'AI is dead'—only that AI progress so far has required exponentially growing inputs that may one day hit headwinds, and that the curve of economic value per ECI point remains unknown. A key first-hand clarification in the ongoing METR/RSI debate.
Related event: METR's 2x AI R&D Acceleration Report Sparks Takeoff Debate(19 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI misalignment incident details drip out on X as analyst urges Anthropic to shorten risk reports — DKokotajlo · 2026-11-11
- Marissa Mayer's AI parenting app Dazzle sparks outsourcing controversy — nordicinst · 2026-11-11
- Gamedev debate: as AI slop floods the market, human-made masterpieces may win — TAbrodi · 2026-11-11
- Robotics researchers debate: "Pure robotics research will end next year" — danfei_xu · 2026-11-11
- Ethan Mollick has AI run a Fermi paradox study on public data: 73% odds we're alone in the Milky Way — emollick · 2026-11-11
- Cloud lab founder: chasing full automation is the wrong goal and will fail — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-11