Scholars may pass off AI reviews as their own — obvious but hard to prove
paulnovosad · x · 2026-11-09
Paul Novosad warns that anonymous peer review carries low reputational cost for AI shirking, and lazy or dishonest academics may submit AI-generated reviews claiming they thought it through themselves — obvious to spot but difficult to prove.
More from AGI Musings
- AI safety talent surge debated: is METR's hiring boom really field-wide growth? — austinc3301 · 2026-11-09
- Gary Marcus: soaring costs of incremental AI gains point to a looming bubble burst — GaryMarcus · 2026-11-09
- Open source is easy to start but hard to polish: the real cost is mental endurance — yangyi · 2026-11-09
- AI era favors broad intermediate skills over maxed-out skill trees, argues dev — zack_overflow · 2026-11-09
- Hot take: speeding up individual AI researchers is a weak metric as big labs fight over compute — ZhongRuiqi · 2026-11-09
- Are faster AI researchers a good progress metric? One researcher argues no — ZhongRuiqi · 2026-11-09