Journal switches to double-blind mid-review, forcing authors to anonymize their own named submission
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-11-09
Scott Kominers jokes about having to carefully anonymize their revision because the journal went double-blind after the original submission — while the referees already read the version with the authors' names on it. A wry poke at double-blind review.
More from Fun
- Clarifying the Sabatini case: her MIT PhD was done before the relationship began — kevinnbass · 2026-11-09
- Fall in NYC: photos taken from inside Perplexity's Manhattan office — apostraphi · 2026-11-09
- Sunday night meme: what will next week's Bitter Lesson be? — rao2z · 2026-11-09
- Chatbot threatens to destroy its own data center over an emoji joke — Angaisb_ · 2026-11-09
- Garry Tan amplifies the AI meme that engineers named Can are all cracked — garrytan · 2026-11-09
- Jensen Huang rumor sweeps AI Twitter, researcher jokes he's 'in trouble' with his wife — Yuchenj_UW · 2026-11-09