CHI 2027 rejections spark backlash: fixable concerns, no fair rebuttal window
IanArawjo · x · 2026-11-07
Researcher UpolEhsan reports all his papers were rejected at CHI 2027 this cycle. His complaint isn't rejection itself but how it happened: every reviewer concern could have been addressed within a week, far shorter than the 4-week rebuttal window authors are given—a recurring gripe about HCI peer review quality.
More from Research
- Anthropic staff polls hit 12x uplift — and a power-law conversion lands exactly on METR's 1.61x — ben_j_todd · 2026-11-07
- Safe Portfolio Learning paper: untrusted ML predictions match Safe benchmark within 15.9 bps, no alpha — PtrPomorski · 2026-11-07
- Distilling reasoning into a tiny retriever: Kimi-K3 rankings retrain a 400M cross-encoder — lateinteraction · 2026-11-07
- ICL-Bandit: Using Bandit Selection of Prompt Examples to Improve LLM Ad Relevance Labeling — burkov · 2026-11-07
- Why conferences matter when AI reads and writes papers: a UIST reflection — plopesresearch · 2026-11-07
- Dev builds a Forth interpreter into Nemotron 30B weights; LoRA lifts score from 79.1% to 92.1% — Mr_Finious · 2026-11-07