Author calls out reviewers for rejecting paper over 'missing' details that were in the manuscript
daibond_alpha · x · 2026-11-07
peterrichtarik highlights a paper rejection whose core justification claimed key components were "missing" — even though they're explicitly detailed in the manuscript. daibondalpha quips that this is worse than any subscription-based LLM, implying hallucinated review feedback.
More from Fun
- A catchy AI-generated song from anabology's Claudia contest is going viral — AIandDesign · 2026-11-07
- 'Migration is human quantitative easing' — a provocative tech-take sparks debate — bronzeagepapi · 2026-11-07
- Working by bonfire light: photo shows YC founder coding on a beach at night — KlausCodes · 2026-11-07
- AI cat-knight army deployed to guard a Maybank account with RM13.76 — basedjensen · 2026-11-07
- Homeowner designs code-compliant backup water system with Claude in a few hours — sebpaquet · 2026-11-07
- Dr. Dre vs Ice Cube debate AI in music: adapt or get left behind — kylegawley · 2026-11-07