A Review With 66 Bullet Points: AI Peer Review's Escalating Extremes
shangbinfeng · x · 2026-11-07
Shangbin Feng shared receiving a paper review containing a whopping 66 bullet points, drawing parallels to last year's infamous ICLR "40+40" review. Such ultra-long reviews have become a talking point about AI peer review culture drifting to extremes.
- 66-item reviews are rare and suggest reviewers padding or standards gone awry
- Echoes the ICLR 40+40 case, showing this isn't an isolated incident
More from Fun
- AI-generated short film clip sparks debate: 'all it needs is a good script to win awards' — Flashy-Impact5757 · 2026-11-07
- Creepy AI-generated 'Delirium tremens' video of two ghoul-like drinkers goes viral — Tall-Key2859 · 2026-11-07
- Endless Sky: a continuous first-person street flythrough showcasing long-horizon video generation — MikirahMuse · 2026-11-07
- Developer builds an elie-style skill to summarize model tech reports in Elie's voice — josh_wills · 2026-11-07
- FAA ditches air traffic control floppy disks, X jokes Teams support lands in 2057 — CtrlAltDwayne · 2026-11-07
- Gemini 4 helps get Switch 2's Zelda: Ocarina of Time remake running on iPhone — ammaar · 2026-11-07