ICLR novelty clash with collaborator's arXiv paper: authors weigh disclosure options
BlancheMinerva · x · 2026-11-07
BlancheMinerva describes a publication ethics bind: their workshop paper A was extended into collaborator paper B on arXiv, and an ICLR reviewer flagged A for claiming novelty on ideas in B — ideas that originated from A's team. Plan: ask B's authors to footnote the prior in-review project, disclose the idea's origin to the reviewer without revealing coauthorship of B, and provide more evidence to the AC.
More from Research
- DSReg: multi-lab preprint disentangles predictive representations without decoders — jiqizhixin · 2026-11-07
- New paper 'Inter-AI Morality' studies how AI systems treat one another — jacyanthis · 2026-11-07
- Steering one GQA key/value group makes a model claim "I am a user" 40 of 40 times — Sauers_ · 2026-11-07
- New research examines the economics of AI for science: winners and bottlenecks — Afinetheorem · 2026-11-07
- Sand3D Explorer lets you browse 106K+ 3D objects with parts, mechanisms and code — victormustar · 2026-11-07
- AI for bio is here: agent usage in Benchling surged through late 2026 — AllThingsApx · 2026-11-07