ICLR reviews 'worse than the papers they review': researchers slam peer review quality
nsaphra · x · 2026-11-07
HF researcher nsaphra amplifies adilsoubki's complaint that everyone criticizes paper quality, but the ICLR review quality is shocking — 'these reviews are literally worse than the papers they are reviewing,' with a wry aside that the system can indeed keep going like this, highlighting the strain peer review is under.
Related event: ICLR Reviewers Caught Submitting Largely AI-Generated Reviews, Authors Say(10 posts)→
More from Research
- Unverified claims: frontier labs allegedly gaming ICLR reviews with malicious reviews — examachine · 2026-11-07
- SSF teaches robots to reason about likely hiding spots when searching for hidden objects — _krishna_murthy · 2026-11-07
- 'Die getting Schmidhubered or live long enough to become one': scaling law priority drama — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-07
- Stanford and Together AI propose Next-Concept Modeling to replace next-token prediction — bendee983 · 2026-11-07
- New benchmark shows some LLMs refuse over 50% of legitimate biology queries — nlarusstone · 2026-11-07
- From AI-designed phage DNA to patient care: the ecosystem behind the model — exnx · 2026-11-07