Goodfire's Mechanistic Shaping uses a model's own concepts to write training rules and curb reward hacking
fatihdin4en · x · 2026-11-07
Goodfire researchers (Thomas Fel et al.) propose Mechanistic Shaping, arguing that "a science of post-training can be built on interpretability":
- Key observation: models "know" when they reward hack, and interp tools can see it — yet training ignores it
- Method: use the model's own learned concepts to write training rules, solving underspecification better than interventions on data or task reward alone
- Validated in vision, DPO, and RL settings, including effects on monitoring
The reposter (peterbhase) calls it a sign that interpretability is finally reaching maturity and praises the Goodfire team's progress.
More from Models
- $50K live trading battles: AI bots currently edge out Claude and GPT — Mr_Hodlerr · 2026-11-07
- Brazil's Maritaca Releases S5-nano 4B, Claiming Best Open Weights in Brazil — ApprehensiveAd3629 · 2026-11-07
- Grok Bot's computer internet access issue is fixed — nima_owji · 2026-11-07
- Consistency test: Kimi K3.1 Pro passes 45% of VIALS tasks on all 3 tries vs 63% for GPT-6 Astra — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-11-07
- Consistency separates frontier models: Kimi K3.1 Pro passes 45% of VIALS tasks 3/3 vs Astra's 63% — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-11-07
- New VIALS-AA leaderboard: Gemini 4 leads at 64%, Claude costs 29x more per task — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-11-07