Critical voices question AI companies' 'publications' lacking peer review
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-11-06
Michael D. Moor argues that some high-profile AI company 'publications' in recent years are not intended for peer review, often amounting to 'trust-me-bro plots.' He questions why journal editors fail to flag such work as PR blog posts.
More from AGI Musings
- YC partner: Boom is the most AI-pilled hardware company — every hardware engineer now codes — ycombinator · 2026-11-06
- Analyzing METR dates to estimate Anthropic's internal capability lead — a 7-day shift moves the integral over 40% — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-06
- 'SF forward-deployed engineers paid 8x shatter at first contact with reality' — doubts cast on RSI assessments — RexDouglass · 2026-11-06
- Younger academics are reshaping academia's rush-to-publish culture, says Stanford prof — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-06
- Stanford prof Anshul Kundaje on why he never fears being scooped in research — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-06
- ML genomics teams coordinated joint release instead of racing to scoop each other — anshulkundaje · 2026-11-06