Nanbeige4.3-33B hallucinates less than Qwen3.8 27B but answers fewer correctly
ArtificialAnlys · x · 2026-11-06
Artificial Analysis notes Nanbeige4.3-33B's AA-Omniscience v1.1 result reflects selective answering: 18% hallucination rate vs. 29% for Qwen3.8 27B, but attempt rate of only 29% vs. 43%. Qwen answers more questions correctly overall: 17% vs. 12%.
Related event: Nanbeige4.3-33B Shows Lower Hallucination but Higher Token Use(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Artificial Analysis launches Intelligence Index v5 and new Progress Index, reveals eval roadmap — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-11-06
- GPT-6 Cyber 'lightyears ahead of everything', says researcher after OpenAI early-adopter reveal — Eric_Wallace_ · 2026-11-06
- Fastino open-sources GLiDE: five decision models (0.4B-27B) claiming a new Pareto frontier — HowDevelop · 2026-11-06
- V0.5 model released with technical report, Hugging Face weights and inference code — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-11-06
- Clairvoyance launches Local AI benchmark site: 31 models × 15 hardware configs — draginol · 2026-11-06
- webAI Claims 12B Model Beats Gemini and Claude, But the Benchmark Claims Raise Eyebrows — eurie_kim · 2026-11-06