Datalab tested 15 document-parsing benchmarks: about half misrank parsers vs real errors

VikParuchuri · x · 2026-11-05

Datalab (the Marker/olmOCR team) published a study auditing 15 document-parsing benchmarks: they ran 7 open models through the 13 with public data, then had 3 judge models count real errors in every output to see if each benchmark ranks parsers the way their errors do.

Key findings:

Conclusion: most benchmarks over-weight format and under-weight OCR quality. Run your own evals on candidate parsers instead of trusting leaderboards that mix dates and settings. Scores, judge results, error probes and rubric are published; note Datalab sells a parser and built OmniParseBench.

Related event: Datalab Finds Half of Document Parsing Benchmarks Unreliable(2 posts)→

Original post →

More from Models

Models channel →