1,300+ graded word-association clues: Google models beat OpenAI, both beat Anthropic

Hardicecream17 · reddit · 2026-11-05

A developer graded 1,300+ clues from a word-association benchmark: one model gives a one-word clue for a 5x5 board, a teammate model guesses, scored on how many of its own words are found before hitting a wrong one. Models played paired games under identical rules and grader.

Average clue grades (95% intervals):

Wrong-board hit rates: Gemini 0–0.5%, GPT-6 0.8–1.9%, Claude 1.7–6%. The cheap tier with thinking off shows the same gap: GPT-6 Luna beat Claude Haiku 5.5 14–2 head-to-head.

Caveats: single task, partly LLM-based grading, and older paid-API models break the pattern (Claude Opus 4.6 topped that table at 55). The author speculates huge consumer user bases may give ChatGPT/Google models more human language-association data.

Related event: Developer's word-association benchmark ranks Google first, OpenAI second, Anthropic last(3 posts)→

Original post →

More from Models

Models channel →