Cyware CTO: Agentic AI threat response needs deterministic guardrails to avoid outages
TechNadu · x · 2026-11-04
Cyware co-founder and CTO Akshat Kumar Jain explains in a TechNadu interview how security teams can deploy agentic AI for automated threat response without causing accidental system outages.
His core recommendations: pair AI recommendations with deterministic guardrails — asset criticality tiers, blast-radius limits, and reversible actions only — with final accountability resting on security leaders rather than the model. Using Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs), choke-point virtual patching, and plain-language evidence chains, enterprises can neutralize zero-day threats, isolate malicious agentic plugin behaviors, and justify high-impact containment actions to non-technical executives.
More from coding & agent
- Phone Harness (YC F26) open-sources a harness that lets AI agents control real phones — ycombinator · 2026-11-05
- Inside a16z's agent podcast: trust is the top fear among 147 tracked AI assistants — a16z · 2026-11-05
- The vibe coding blind spot: people can't articulate their AI-built products' benefits — rms80 · 2026-11-05
- Non-dev built an agent-only eSIM store; a Claude agent bought one with real USDC — Apprehensive_Big5042 · 2026-11-05
- Google Cloud's five-rule playbook for evaluating whether agent skills are worth their tokens — rseroter · 2026-11-05
- Google DeepMind 工程师将登 AIE CODE 峰会,讲述删掉 90% 评估框架的故事 — _philschmid · 2026-11-05