1,300+ graded word-association clues: Google models beat OpenAI's, both beat Anthropic's

Hardicecream17 · reddit · 2026-11-04

A developer used his Word Spies game (Codenames-style, with live clue grading, embedding maps and win odds) to benchmark models: one model gives a one-word clue, a teammate model guesses, across 1,300+ graded clues.

Key results (average clue grade, 95% interval):

Wrong-word/assassin hit rates: Gemini 0-0.5%, GPT-6 0.8-1.9%, Claude 1.7-6%. Cheap tier with thinking off shows the same gap: GPT-6 Luna beat Claude Haiku 5.5 14-2 over 16 games.

Caveats: single task, partly LLM-graded, and older paid-API models break the pattern (Claude Opus 4.6 topped that table at 55). The author speculates large consumer user bases give Google/OpenAI more human-language data.

Related event: Google Beats OpenAI in 1300+ Clue Word Association Test, Anthropic Lags(2 posts)→

Original post →

More from Models

Models channel →