Ethan Mollick: GPT-6 Pro and Opus 5.5 High can give genuinely insightful paper feedback
emollick · x · 2026-11-04
Ethan Mollick weighs in on the ongoing fight over how AI should be used in academic peer review.
His practical suggestion: prove it to yourself rather than argue in the abstract—ask GPT-6 Pro or Opus 5.5 High to give helpful, substantive feedback on one of your own papers. Used properly, he argues, AI can be quite insightful at this.
More from AGI Musings
- AI will transform education, but unrestricted models shouldn't sit in classrooms yet — AndyMasley · 2026-11-04
- Tacit Labs' AI-for-biology thesis: optimize drug discovery, not biology itself — jefrankle · 2026-11-04
- Fei-Fei Li and Jensen Huang discuss open models and specialized intelligence on stage — sophiamyang · 2026-11-04
- Survey maps 50 years of quant equity investing, from portfolio theory to multi-agent AI — PtrPomorski · 2026-11-04
- New essay imagines 'associational discovery' AI that turns a kid's wish into real community action — edelwax · 2026-11-04
- Andrew Ng: asking if LLMs beat specialists at their own game is now meaningless — andrewgwils · 2026-11-04