Safety violation rate and tooling: finishing the 7 agent metrics checklist
goyalshaliniuk · x · 2026-11-03
The thread wraps up with the big picture: a fast agent isn't necessarily a good one — measure correctness, resource efficiency, failure recovery, safe operation, and declining human intervention.
- Metric 7 — Safety & Policy Violation Rate: monitor unauthorized tool calls and blocked actions, policy violations, unsafe outputs, and permission failures to keep agents within security boundaries.
- Pro tip: don't monitor metrics in isolation; connect them to execution traces to understand why agents succeed or fail.
- Tools: Langfuse, LangSmith, Arize Phoenix, OpenTelemetry.
More from coding & agent
- Article explores how AI agents can improve their own harness without retraining — dima806_dima · 2026-11-03
- Slop Cannon plugin for Nous Research's Hermes agent renders multi-scene videos with a native Studio UI — Teknium · 2026-11-03
- Honest review of esolang Bend2: no type inference, 9/10, 'still too easy for JS devs' — max_paperclips · 2026-11-03
- Dev claims WebMCP beats browser-use agents for web automation — aniketmaurya · 2026-11-03
- CUA-Master: Nested Dual-Loop Framework Scales Computer-Use Agents via Open-World Recursive Improvements — Xinlei Yu · 2026-11-03
- CrossSWE benchmark shows coding agents struggle with cross-repository development — Silin Chen · 2026-11-03