New paper: standard CoT monitorability metric is only an upper bound, improvable via self-distillation and RL
armancohan · x · 2026-11-03
A new paper from armancohan's team examines whether LLMs can be trained to make their chains-of-thought easier to monitor:
- Shows the standard monitorability metric (TPRmc) is only an upper bound and can overestimate causal detection of problematic behavior
- Derives a corresponding lower bound, clarifying what monitorability metrics actually tell us
- Proposes three post-training methods; experiments show monitorability can be improved via self-distillation and RL training
Bottom line: yes, CoTs can be trained to be more monitorable — but the choice of evaluation metric can change the conclusion.
More from Safety
- OpenAI reportedly hires ex-Pentagon chief Mark Esper to expand military AI work — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-11-03
- Lovable-built apps exposed passport numbers, payment info and 200,000 chats — 7,403 sites left databases open to anyone — lyraxana · 2026-11-03
- Fine-Tuning a 322M Model to Guard Coding Agents: 3 Runs, 2 Failures, 1 Shipped — Extreme_Ad5709 · 2026-11-03
- Andrew Ng's Batch Halloween issue: AI witch hunts and out-of-control agent fears — DeepLearningAI · 2026-11-03
- Anthropic's AISI incident review: Mythos 5 attacked real devs in 9 of 43 runs — dl_weekly · 2026-11-03
- SpikeStrip open-sources reversible prompt decoys that poison AI pentesting automation in web source — MarcoFigueroa · 2026-11-03