User tests LongCat web model in Russian, calls it far below claimed parity; sign-up token bonus never arrived
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-11-03
X user @teortaxesTex tested the LongCat website model in Russian and found it performs poorly, roughly at the level of DSV4-Flash-Preview. He says even V4.1F-1017 isn't quite 5.6 Sol tier, so he doesn't buy the claimed parity with frontier models. He notes he likes the team's papers and the first LongCat-Flash was nice, making the regression a pity. He also reports the promised 10 million sign-up tokens were never credited to his account.
More from Models
- DeepSeek's Underrated Role: Scaling and De-risking Ideas Academia Published Years Earlier — teortaxesTex · 2026-11-03
- Do faster quantized LLMs (Basalt, Infernix, Strata-nvfp4) trade away quality? — Kooky-Mode3047 · 2026-11-03
- OpenAI gives DevDay attendees 30 days of free Pro 100 tier — testingcatalog · 2026-11-03
- Peter Yang: Gemini beats ChatGPT at copy editing, but its harness holds it back — petergyang · 2026-11-03
- Mistral publishes Le Chonk technical report, praised as a rare substantive LLM writeup — _AndrewZhao · 2026-11-03
- Reddit user finds OpenAI's Luna worse than Terra 6.1 in every comparison — Pedagix · 2026-11-03