Answering "Human Slop Is 1000x Worse": AI's Attention Edge Is the Bull Case for Ongoing Innovation
noahsolomon · x · 2026-11-02
Responding to dabit3's claim that "human slop is 1000x worse than AI slop," noahsolomon argues that human attention bandwidth falls far short of what AI can cover—and that's precisely the bull case for AI continuously producing genuinely new things rather than shallow derivatives. Many feedback loops once thought to be naturally broken are now being reconnected by AI, one by one.
More from AGI Musings
- Wharton finance professor: Claude worth $200/month, but industry shouldn't chase superintelligence — JeffLadish · 2026-11-02
- RSI critique: the idea that labs solving math beats the world's real data is solipsistic — akbirthko · 2026-11-02
- Building AI hardware design loops while fearing models will one-shot it — samiramanabi · 2026-11-02
- Jobs focused on "fixing AI" mistakes surge over 85% — alejandroll10 · 2026-11-02
- eigenrobot on operating systems he doesn't fully understand — at work and in society — eigenrobot · 2026-11-02
- AI tutor asks how to spell 'seventeen': great lift in theory, implementation matters — Pascallisch · 2026-11-02