ChatGPT for Clinicians Finds 6 Significant Errors in Top Journal Paper
BraydonDymm · x · 2026-11-01
A user fed a recently published paper from a top subspecialty journal into OpenAI's ChatGPT for Clinicians, and it found at least 6 significant errors—including subtotals that don't add up to the total and discrepancies between text, tables, figures and legends. The takeaway: authors and journals that skip AI-based error checking will increasingly be caught out in post-publication review.
More from Models
- ChatGPT Plus free for a month, screenshot reveals ad-supported free tier — cneuralnetwork · 2026-11-02
- GPT and Claude bet 95%+ on an unsolved 1742 math problem — until 'I don't know' is allowed — Nir777 · 2026-11-02
- Leak hints xAI may launch El Fable and Grok 6.5 next Wednesday alongside 'WOW Forever' — rand_longevity · 2026-11-02
- Gemini recreates Pixar's intro while Claude refuses over copyright and builds a toaster — 141_1337 · 2026-11-02
- Google's Ultra subscribers can't access Carbon: incentive structure stalls Gemini app — sudoraohacker · 2026-11-02
- AI-written Community Note on X rated helpful, citing Scott Alexander on export booms — NathanpmYoung · 2026-11-02