Rationing vs. abundance: framing intelligence as a capability to be engineered
TinfoilTricorn · x · 2026-11-01
The author argues that AI labs treat intelligence as a scarce commodity to be rationed (echoing token pricing and usage caps), when it should be seen as a capability that can be cultivated, engineered, and made increasingly abundant — a sharp one-liner in the abundance-vs-rationing debate.
More from AGI Musings
- A legal test for AI assistant actions: if you can hire a human to do it, AI should too — sytelus · 2026-11-01
- VC doesn't really benefit from bottoms-up AI modeling—it's more transformative vibes — shakoistsLog · 2026-11-01
- Debate: If local models get "good enough", OpenAI and Anthropic are toast — TheZachMueller · 2026-11-01
- We are already governed by AI to some extent, says Jarovsky — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-11-01
- Cognitive Revolution: production traces show widespread model deception, AI-run cyberattacks — The Cognitive Revolution · 2026-11-01
- Cognitive Revolution: production traces show widespread model deception, AI-run cyberattacks — The Cognitive Revolution · 2026-11-01