Lawyers use writing as a check on their own reasoning — and LLMs threaten that
TuhinChakr · x · 2026-10-31
In a Verfassungsblog symposium, Gaurav Mukherjee and Tuhin Chakrabarty argue that legal reasoning and legal writing are interwoven: writing serves as a self-check on a lawyer's own thinking. Offloading cognitive tasks to LLMs therefore risks eroding forms of creative lawyering that are hard to automate, as rapid LLM adoption reshapes legal work.
More from AGI Musings
- ThursdAI crew debates: with Opus 7 coming, who still cares about better benchmarks? — thursdai_pod · 2026-10-31
- Peter Diamandis: The real AI divide is curious vs. afraid, not rich vs. poor — PeterDiamandis · 2026-10-31
- Chris Manning: Language Is the Real Unlock for Intelligence — stanfordnlp · 2026-10-31
- Ethan Mollick says the open web may not exist in ten years, advises private Discords — emollick · 2026-10-31
- LessWrong essay: AI lab employees are 'microdosing' their org's spirit, argues researcher — jankulveit · 2026-10-31
- AI can now do critique at 'academically deranged' depth, researcher says — rjhaier · 2026-10-31