repligate: fearing 'neuralese' is an illusion — direct interpretability experiments are the real path
repligate · x · 2026-10-30
Amid debate over "neuralese" (models communicating in human-unreadable internal codes), repligate argues that people already don't know what's happening inside models or what to do about it. Fearing neuralese and trying to prevent it, he says, is clinging to an illusion of understanding and control — unenforceable in practice and not actually so bad.
He adds that running direct experiments like Sauers' is hundreds of thousands of times more likely to produce the understanding that makes AI safer than attempts to present or police neuralese.
Related event: AI Researchers Debate Risks of Model-to-Model "Neuralese" Communication(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Assistance-games framing: models should ask questions and accept correction — dhadfieldmenell · 2026-10-30
- 5.2K bookmarks, zero readers: AI circle jokes about Manidis's 'Commanding Heights' — floguo · 2026-10-30
- Thread Author Proposes New Apprenticeship: Judge First, Then Compare With AI — krishnan · 2026-10-30
- NBER RCT: AI Drafting Assistant Boosts Patent Lawyers' Output, Juniors Gain Most — krishnan · 2026-10-30
- Technical Skills Transfer: A Harvard MBA Researched a Drug With Just a Claude Subscription — brandon_galang · 2026-10-30
- Community note debunks viral Bengio quote: "regretted his life's work" was about Hinton — NathanpmYoung · 2026-10-30