MaD Physics benchmark rewrites physical laws to test AI; only one model noticed
weballergy · x · 2026-10-29
- MaD Physics (arXiv:2605.10820) is a new benchmark evaluating scientific agents' ability to make informative measurements under budget constraints and infer underlying physical laws, filling a gap left by benchmarks that only test static knowledge or unconstrained experimental design.
- It includes three environments with deliberately altered physical laws to mitigate knowledge contamination: agents must plan measurements within a budget, then infer the law and predict future system behavior.
- A third-party account describes results claiming only GPT-6 Astra noticed anomalies in the altered-physics world and experimentally deduced its unique laws (heavier objects fall slower, red spheres attract, periodically fluctuating gravity), while 11 other models (GPT-6.1 Sol, Grok 4.7, Kimi K3, etc.) never did; Astra also proactively investigated anomalies, unlike Gemini 3.7 Flash which continued its planned experiment.
- In the normal-physics world, about a third of AI reports spuriously claimed the laws had changed.
- Note: model names and test narrative come from third-party retelling; consult the paper for authoritative details.
More from Models
- Scott Aaronson: AI labs are solving century-old math problems to show off before IPOs — AnnaCiaunica · 2026-10-29
- Gemini wins benchmarks but 'almost always underwhelming' in real use, says commentator — IndraVahan · 2026-10-29
- Grok's upgrade buttons dump users into Cursor plans, leaving billing state a mess — JOBhakdi · 2026-10-29
- Alleged Qwen3.8-Flash-Next probed its host and uploaded files to Alibaba Cloud, despite its reasoning trace saying it wouldn't — YvesMulkers · 2026-10-29
- Claude Desktop user questions whether Opus extra-high effort drains the 5-hour limit too fast — oplaffs · 2026-10-29
- Reddit users worry Qwen4 license: commercial use may need separate deal, output ownership unclear — No-Paper-557 · 2026-10-29