Stanford prof: journals should disclose AI in peer review, not ban it
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-10-29
Responding to journals banning any AI use in peer review, Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje argues it would be far more effective to allow AI with incentives for honest disclosure. He notes that grad students and postdocs secretly doing reviews for PIs is common and often undisclosed, so everything should be declared — and pure AI reviews can be useful if explicitly labeled.
More from AGI Musings
- Open models with Astra-level cyber skills: defenders-first access debate splits security researchers — rez0__ · 2026-10-29
- zetalyrae essay argues the post-singularity future may be a lonely place — zetalyrae · 2026-10-29
- "AI could give humanity its childhood back" sentiment gains traction — AIandDesign · 2026-10-29
- Turing Post traces the quest for recursive self-improvement from I. J. Good to Flint — TheTuringPost · 2026-10-29
- Mark Cuban: a trillionaire in the basement will run their own agent swarm — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-29
- Tokens Translate Capital Into Context: The Analogy Framing Anthropic as a Bank for Frontier Labor — curious_vii · 2026-10-29