'Ask Claude to explain it' is not an economic moat: humans won't stay useful by copy-pasting AI explanations
GabGarrett · x · 2026-10-28
@rationalaussie pushes back sharply against a viral post reassuring mathematicians and scientists worried about AI: companies don't care about understanding per se, they care about verifiable outcomes. The idea that humans far dumber than a superintelligence stay economically useful by having Claude explain things and pasting that to their boss is, in his words, delusional cope.
The original post argued from computational neuroscience history: scientists spent decades hand-constructing brain models, until 10 years ago AI-built computer vision models turned out to be better models of the visual cortex than anything humans designed—with language following the same path—implying fields being overtaken by AI is the norm, not the end.
More from AGI Musings
- Scott Barry Kaufman launches Human Potential Lab podcast, ep 1 asks what it's like to be an AI — PeterBowdenLive · 2026-10-28
- Who actually pays for UBI if AI takes most jobs? A Reddit thread asks — Loud_Bison572 · 2026-10-28
- Law class test: all 17 AI-drafted appellate opinions affirmed, but the real court reversed — sebkrier · 2026-10-28
- One chart explains why robots are harder to commercialize: physical work demands far higher reliability — Rewkang · 2026-10-28
- EMNLP 2026 panel: How to measure the positive social impact of AI and NLP — ZhijingJin · 2026-10-28
- ML researcher: discipline yourself to think before asking the AI oracle — johnowhitaker · 2026-10-28