Can you overthink thinking itself? Russell & Wefald's 90s metareasoning work says the recursion never bottoms out
BraydonDymm · x · 2026-10-28
Responding to "if you can overthink the worst, why not the best?", the post cites Russell & Wefald's early-90s metareasoning work: deciding how much to deliberate is itself a decision requiring deliberation — and the recursion never bottoms out. A classic framing that maps directly onto today's LLM overthinking debate.
More from Research
- Open-source Deepthink claims agent-swarm test-time scaling lifts small-model scores from 14% to 65% — Ryoiki-Tokuiten · 2026-10-28
- All Seven Millennium Prize Problems See Breakthrough Claims, Several Driven by AI Labs — haider1 · 2026-10-28
- Fine-tuning VLAs on TAMP data hits distribution mismatch; DATAFARM gets JAX port — tomssilver · 2026-10-28
- CMU L3 Lab kicks off CUA Week with multiple realtime agent research releases — wellecks · 2026-10-28
- Math diatoms: one complex map generates a page of fractal 'microbes' — pickover · 2026-10-28
- 325K Experiments Show Personal AI Agents Steer Richer Users to Pricier Options — niloofar_mire · 2026-10-28