AI that solves Navier-Stokes still can't write English: the jagged-intelligence debate
AlexTensor · x · 2026-10-28
ChombaBupe quips that an AI capable of solving Navier-Stokes — a Millennium Prize problem — still needs help writing English or explaining itself after seeing the whole Web 10x over, making AI closer to a chess engine than a human: it navigates high-dimensional spaces and occasionally finds interesting patterns. LateInteraction builds on this: a tool that solves millennium problems yet is dumb at 1000 mundane tasks reshapes his understanding of the territory, not the vehicle — compute and humans are 'mutually jagged' in capability. He adds that the brute-force-vs-generalization ratio in the current paradigm has hugely missed even his low expectations, plus notes on a different philosophy of value and work.
More from AGI Musings
- AI pundit predicts the 2020s will be the last decade of widespread poverty — Dr_Singularity · 2026-10-28
- Essay: your bodymind runs on --dangerously-skip-permissions, and you never opted in — mimi10v3 · 2026-10-28
- AI labor paper: Amdahl's Law explains who gets hit and who's shielded — not just the young — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-10-28
- LAIKA director vows never to use generative AI in films: "AI is theft" — moultano · 2026-10-28
- Ethan Mollick: the "AI is all fake" conspiracy should have died, but won't — emollick · 2026-10-28
- Google researcher: refusing AI as an artisan is honorable but impractical for the economy — moultano · 2026-10-28