Economist Backs Tough Sanctions for Academic AI Writing: 'Acceptable Amount Is 0%'
paulnovosad · x · 2026-10-27
In a thread on AI-writing detection, economist paulnovosad argues the only acceptable amount of AI writing in academic literature is 0%, so he supports significant sanctions against repeat offenders who submit fully AI-generated work — following his earlier claim that authors producing 100% AI work tend to have histories of malfeasance.
Related event: Researchers Debate AI Writing Detection Accuracy and Penalties(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- 'Lessons learned' papers may be worth more to AI models than 2500-citation atlas papers — owl_posting · 2026-10-27
- The SMB process-data gold rush: 1M businesses selling know-how to RL environment companies — willcb · 2026-10-27
- Economist-spotlighted paper asks what evidence on work and wellbeing implies for AI futures — HaydnBelfield · 2026-10-27
- AI Researcher Flags Academic Post Hinting at Aerial Tracking, Zero Questions Raised — giffmana · 2026-10-27
- US Creative Industries Lost 200k Jobs in Four Years as AI Rises — emmanuelvivier · 2026-10-27
- Entrepreneur argues "AI slop" dismissals are choking off needed debate on AI's job impact — Admir-Rusidovic · 2026-10-27