Researchers push back on hype that AI papers done in 2–3 days make peer review obsolete
ChongZzZhang · x · 2026-10-25
In a reposted exchange, Georgia Chal clarifies her concern isn't with the authors or how quickly they built on existing work, but with the surrounding hype claiming research can now be done in 2–3 days and that peer review no longer matters. She argues the community should celebrate advances without setting misleading expectations for younger researchers.
More from AGI Musings
- Apollo chief economist: AI has delivered "zero payoff" outside Big Tech — Polymarket · 2026-10-25
- 141-word SIGN Act proposal would jail AI CEOs who lie about model safety — StephenLCasper · 2026-10-25
- "Do LLMs Feel?" paper maps localized emotion circuits inside LLMs — mikeflache · 2026-10-25
- 'Fear is moat': Redditor argues OpenAI and Anthropic stoke AI fear to lock in API revenue — RakesProgress · 2026-10-25
- The gate is already open: AI removed the gatekeepers, most people are still waiting for permission — r0ck3t23 · 2026-10-25
- Dev reviews 15 AI predictions for 2026: 6 right, 2 wrong, security and memory moats confirmed — tibo_maker · 2026-10-25