Dev pushes back on Gemini hallucination claims citing near-perfect precision
MickeySteamboat · x · 2026-10-25
Responding to theo's finding that Gemini hallucinated in 80%+ of multi-model review runs, MickeySteamboat reports needle-in-haystack precision with practically unlimited context in his own setup, speculating dynamic or static linking may be to blame — highlighting how hallucination rates vary wildly by usage pattern.
Related event: Debate Erupts Over Gemini Hallucinations in Multi-Model Reviews(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Mystery 'Iron Goddess' video model appears on LM Arena, believed from a major Chinese lab — koltregaskes · 2026-10-25
- Kimi K3.1 tops Vals open-weight index as prominent evaluator admits bidirectional forecast miss — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-25
- Bill Gates wants powerful open-weight models legally confined to government-certified platforms — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-25
- LLMs are the overthinking final boss: think too much, forget, then hallucinate — gaganghotra_ · 2026-10-25
- The classiest model flex is putting it in the technical report — see Kimi — HanchungLee · 2026-10-25
- User analysis: global quota resets are timed to expire your banked resets — TaskChance1404 · 2026-10-25