Investor raises AI bubble probability from 15% to 30% after SF trip, warns on capex funding
sebpaquet · x · 2026-10-24
After a recent trip to SF, the author moved his subjective probability of an AI bubble from 15% to 30%. Key points:
- Smart people at Jane Street, HRT, OpenAI and Anthropic remain personally long and bullish, but technical brilliance and high pay don't guarantee good market judgment — pre-2008 banks employed the world's smartest people and still got their assumptions badly wrong.
- The bull case is easy for him to make himself: recursive self-improvement toward ASI, agents creating a dwarfishly larger economy.
- Quoted context: when AI CEOs say they're capital-constrained, investors should be at least somewhat bearish. The buildout's pace depends on who finances the next increment of spending — and if it exceeds hyperscalers' operating cash flow, the marginal outside investor likely doesn't share management's conviction, even though valuations already assume the spending happens.
More from AGI Musings
- Book excerpt reveals how young Demis Hassabis defined "doing your best": collapse at the finish line — chaitjo · 2026-10-25
- Jensen Huang on raising kids in the AI era: curiosity, hard work, willingness to struggle — kimmonismus · 2026-10-25
- Top AI Lab Recruiting Macro Economists at $250/hr to Grade AI's Economics — Reddit frets labs are coming for research jobs — mindaro_sienna · 2026-10-25
- Investor warns humanized AI could trigger mass "AI psychosis" within five years — birchlse · 2026-10-25
- Owning scarce physical assets plus AI beats building models, argues investor — karinanguyen · 2026-10-25
- CrowdStrike CEO: AI lets low-skill hackers launch nation-state-level attacks — VraserX · 2026-10-25