Kimi K3.1 Pro scores strong on Cat leaderboard, but 9x pricing draws complaints
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-10-24
Kimi K3.1 Pro posted results on the well-known domestic benchmark "Cat leaderboard" for logical reasoning, with genuinely strong scores showing the benefit of its large-parameter foundation. But a quoted user complained about 4x inference time, 5x cost, and 9x pricing: "being poor and out of time isn't Kimi's problem, it's ours."
More from Models
- A two-neuron steering recipe turns Qwen3.5-4B into "evil qwen" — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-10-24
- Leaker pwk teases big Monday announcement with good and bad news for OpenAI and Anthropic — imjustnewatai · 2026-10-24
- Rumor: OpenAI's next-gen model 'Bel' reportedly exceeds 10T parameters, eyes post-GPT-6 — Soggy_Perspective776 · 2026-10-24
- KRAFTON Releases Raon-1 Mini: 30B MoE With 4B Active Params, Tops BrowseComp Plus at 55.7 — Kangwook_Lee · 2026-10-24
- Do Benchmarks Really Reflect Real-World Workflows? Four Objections — Lucky_Creme_5208 · 2026-10-24
- Kimi K3.1 Pro scores just 9% on real-robot tasks, trailing Opus 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon — peterwildeford · 2026-10-24