Parent uses 214-revision document history to overturn daughter's false AI-cheating accusation
AlexTensor · x · 2026-10-24
A parent recounts how his daughter was accused of AI cheating in front of her class, based on an AI detector's verdict. He submitted the document's version history as evidence: 214 revisions and four and a half hours of writing across three days, complete with deletions, unfinished sentences, and pauses.
When pressed, the teacher insisted the detection system was "very reliable" but couldn't state its error margin or explain who validated the claimed 97% accuracy. The parent filed a formal grade review with the version history attached; the grade was corrected the following week.
His bigger concern: a teenager was publicly accused based on a machine nobody around her actually understood. "They're using a machine to accuse teenagers without knowing how the machine works."
More from AGI Musings
- David Deutsch: embodiment is basically irrelevant for consciousness — "I am a computer program!" — burny_tech · 2026-10-24
- "Nobody mocked cybersecurity risks — we mocked mass-unemployment doomers" — AlexTensor · 2026-10-24
- Anthropic exec's "we tried to warn the world" draws accusations of AI-lab hypocrisy — AlexTensor · 2026-10-24
- One cartoon nails why enterprise AI transformation stalls: missing data, process, training, change — kuanhoong · 2026-10-24
- microagi promises a billion robots by 2029; skeptics say scene understanding won't be solved by 2027 — AlexTensor · 2026-10-24
- Roko puts 15% odds on months-long internet shutdown; rebuttal: the internet routes around failure — basedjensen · 2026-10-24