Refine founder pushes back on AI peer review hype: science is not naturally aligned
JessicaHullman · x · 2026-10-24
The founder of Refine.ink offers a practitioner's take on the new Harvard AI peer-review paper: he agrees AI reviews provide incredibly detailed, actionable manuscript feedback, but rejects the replacement framing — "science is not naturally aligned; you will never arrive at something meaningful by removing human judgment."
More from AGI Musings
- Runway CEO: generative AI quality, resolution and control double roughly every year — c_valenzuelab · 2026-10-24
- dhh: China's Programmers' Day shows why its engineering culture wins at AI — prasanna_says · 2026-10-24
- Founder: The Best AI Use Is Augmenting Your Best People, Not Full Agent Autonomy — jacob_posel · 2026-10-24
- Mistral's Timestral tops time-series benchmarks with 209M params, built mostly by agents — hkproj · 2026-10-24
- Cloudflare CEO: 'Every single week it's going to feel like the sky is falling' as AI uncovers critical vulnerabilities — Polymarket · 2026-10-24
- Svante Pääbo's team uses AlphaGenome as a time machine to reconstruct human gene regulatory evolution — gleech · 2026-10-24