ICLR reviewer despairs over reviewing 'slop' papers as submission quality craters
chhaviyadav_ · x · 2026-10-24
An ICLR reviewer posted that this year's assigned papers are making them "want to cry," calling the submission pile torture and unreviewable slop — a snapshot of reviewer burnout as conference submissions balloon and low-quality AI-generated papers multiply.
More from Research
- Action learning: score whole trajectories with no forces or simulator, 2000× lower error — LeoTZ03 · 2026-10-24
- BeNice! method shares KV-cache across loops, scaling looped LLM depth without extra memory — stochasticchasm · 2026-10-24
- 215-state Turing machine proven to halt iff ZFC is inconsistent, verified in Metamath Zero — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-24
- OmniRay from JHU hits SOTA camera-agnostic monocular 3D reconstruction from one image — kwangmoo_yi · 2026-10-24
- AWS multi-turn RL guide: $339 lifts gpt-oss-20b Wordle solve rate 61%→84% — AWS ML Blog · 2026-10-24
- Eric Horvitz spotlights Stanford's tool-making research philosophy behind optogenetics — erichorvitz · 2026-10-24